(The presentation I made to the community meeting on Monday night January 28th, 2019)
I have always said this property dispute was an assault on our community.
We have been in a war on the soul of our retirement paradise for over six years, and we are now at a Time of Reckoning…
Currently in San Diego county, at least 8 golf courses have closed, and several more are teetering on the edge of destruction. In virtually every case, the neighbors are confronted with a dilemma: do they put up a fight or roll over and accept a community remodel they don't respect?
Like us, those groups will all have to make some difficult decisions...
Six years ago a group of local homeowners formed ECCHO to defend the community from a bully who was out to flip the community's centerpiece golf course to make a lot of money.
We all know that recently the Escondido City Council approved The New Urban West plan for 382 new homes by a slim 3 to 2 margin. Council members Mike Morasco, Ed Gallo and Olga Diaz said the concerns of the community had been adequately addressed. But they never denied that the project would:
Nevertheless, according to our City Council and the developers, the deal was done….
ECCHO appealed that approval, and as you know, Judge Roland Frazier ruled against us.
But ECCHO's lead attorney, Everett Delano said the judge totally misunderstood the meaning and intent of a key provision of the Escondido General Plan. A provision called Proposition S. We just heard former Mayor Jerry Harmon talk about that important amendment to the General Plan, and why it is vital to the future of our city.
Additionally, we believe Judge Frazier overlooked an inadequately researched and poorly documented Environmental Impact Report. The leaders of ECCHO made another tough decision: they decided to challenge Judge Frazier's ruling.
So here we are, still battling, still trying to do the right thing for the future of this neighborhood.
Many of you want to know, "What have we accomplished in six years?"
Well, up until just a few days ago, we still had
People ask me, "Why haven't we had more success?"
When major land development disputes occur, we turn to our elected officials to help protect our interests and investments. We expect them to represent our interests in proportion to those of the property owner. And we expect them to respect the integrity and dignity of our community.
But the truth is, all this time, we have been fighting with one arm tied behind our back.
Every indication is that City officials, the mayor, some council members and some planning commissioners never really supported our efforts. They were projecting an illusion designed to soften the impact of the conversion of the golf course to housing.
They knew their "Open Space" actions would be overturned. Their own attorneys told them that. I believe they were making a political play, to calm the community temporarily.
When they decided it would be too expensive to challenge the Citizens Property Rights Open Space Initiative ruling, the illusion was revealed. Ever since that ruling, the City has been more aligned with the interests of Michael Schlesinger than with our community.
The bottom line is, New Urban West has been given permission to do exactly what Michael Schlesinger always wanted to do. To build as many houses as he could get approved on the now fallow fairways.
'The Villages' plan is Proposition H with lipstick…
I am sure a lot of you are wondering,"why do we keep fighting?"
The answer is, it's all about respect. Golf course repurposing is very contentious because it can totally change the nature and character of a long settled neighborhood. People who have invested their life savings in that neighborhood ought to have some say about how those changes are made.
I think we can all agree that our community has been disrespected by both the property owner and the City.
Michael Schlesinger said he was willing to compromise. That never happened. Then Mayor Abed claimed he sympathized with our situation. He told us to "trust the process." Every indication is the Mayor, on one hand encouraged Schlesinger to build houses on the golf course. while on the other hand, he was telling us the City would protect our interests.
They both misled and disrespected our community.
So now, we have to use the court system to force the City to respect us and to respect Proposition S!
So it is our contention that in their rush to get this ugly and expensive battle behind them, the city violated the terms of the General Plan they wrote! By approving the Villages Project without voter approval the council ignored the 1998 General Plan provision that specifically requires new project upzoning must be approved by the voters. Since The Villages Plan calls for attached and multifamily condominiums on land designated as single family residence only, it clearly upzones R1-7 zoning restrictions.
That means it should have been placed before the voters.
The City can disrespect us, but they cannot disrespect the law, unless we let them get away with it. That is why we must appeal Judge Frazier's ruling. We must demand the Judge show respect for the Escondido General Plan!
Someone once said, "No one wins in court. It's just a matter of who gets hurt worse."
Our community has been very fortunate to have had excellent legal representation since the very beginning. We must trust our capable legal professionals to navigate the court system to protect our rights and the future of our community. Of course, we all know our justice system favors those with deep pockets because they can sustain a protracted court battle. That is where we find ourselves right now. We are David fighting a financial Goliath.
But there is another important reason why we must stay the course...The Escondido Country Club battle is the tip of the spear in golf course repurposing battles that are happening all over the country. Our battle is a petri dish and we are being watched by other anxious homeowner organizations.
In the end, it may well come down to the will and determination of the community members. It is a critical moment, and as in any battle, there comes a Time of Reckoning.
This is that time.
They took all the trees
And put them in a tree museum
And they charged all the people
A dollar and a half to see 'em
Don't it always seem to go
That you don't know what you've got
'Till it's gone
They paved paradise
And they put up a parking lot
We are now in our sixth year of the War On Escondido.
In 2012 the Escondido Country Club Community was struck by a virus that has continued to eat away at our soul. It has cost the neighborhood millions in lost home equity, in legal expenses, in human connectivity and in personal health. Many of the people who owned homes adjacent to the abandoned property have seen their retirement dreams turned into nightmares. Some have simply decided life is too short to spend any more of what they have left trying to preserve the community they built for the next generation.
Time passes and the energy it takes to fight change, dissipates.
In many ways, this battle reflects the generational divisions faced by all Americans. The question is, just how far should the current generation go to preserve what many in the next generation simply don't venerate? Are the neighborhood preservationists right to put value in community spirit and tradition? Or are we standing in the way of progress?
A few years after a forest fire, nature rejuvenates itself and soon it is hard to see evidence of past fires. In a community under attack, the neighborhood just keeps getting sicker. The vast expanses of fairway grass that once exemplified our quiet corner of paradise have now reversed themselves into what has become a battered and sickly bargaining chip in a ruthless battle for development rights. Our community is on it's back in a hospital bed, with little or no help to keep it alive. The only folks attending to the patient are a few hundred hardcore homeowners who refuse to give in to the malevolent virus.
The conflict is over visions of the future: One side wants to preserve the sameness that made our neighborhood a united community. The other side wants to divide it up into villages, designed to establish enclaves, all different, and quite the opposite of what currently exists. One is for conformity and a retirement theme, the other is for modernity and urbanity, and creating a treasure chest of profits, too.
The proposed new development would be like mixing water and oil, which is not in and of itself a bad thing, unless you value continuity and assimilation...
Oxygen tanks and all, the resistance continues to rally for life support from a court system that has up until now, been hostile and indifferent. As we approach the end of 2018, will our bedside watch be rewarded? Is there life left in this battle? Can the Spirit of Escondido Past hold on to see a renovated community restore its place in history as one of the premier retirement colonies in all of Southern California, or will the tide of modernity simple wash all of those memories and hopes away?
If history is any indicator...
What Happened to Our Community?
The story of how a quiet corner of paradise has devolved into
To review the timelines of this ongoing saga, just <click> on any Month below....
You might also like:
What happened on November 9th, 2016? Can anyone tell us how Donald Trump became leader of the free world?
Will Progressives ever own up to how they have divided the country? They whine and complain, but the truth is their policies always result in unintended consequences.
I explore how Trump's Reckoning with the Cult of Progressivism is the only medicine that can restore the American Spirit of Exceptionalism, and how the world needs Americanism to thrive.
Click here to buy it now!