Who did you trust? When the November 2014 Escondido Mayoral race came down to two candidates, voters had to place their trust in one or the other. Olga Diaz, the upstart civilian political novice, who displayed great energy, enthusiasm and a refreshing sense of 'outsider' naivete. She showed great empathy for the disenfranchised, the marginalized, and the poor. She promised to bring the community together, to look forward and to protect the integrity of the Escondido experience. She had looked many residents of the Country Club area in the eye and told us she appreciated our community activism, energy and commitment to the political process. Nearly a year later, it is now clear that despite Olga Diaz' duplicitous actions, switching sides and supporting the efforts of the LA based property flipper, that ultimately, she was at least honest about her position. It probably cost her the election, and as much vitriol as her betrayal engendered, she stuck to her guns and took a stand. It pains me to say that, but it is true. Incumbent Republican Abed on the other hand, said voters could trust him to continue his fiscal prudence. He was "proud of his ethics and integrity" and his "leadership skills." And he asked the ECC people to be patient and to know, he had our back. Back in August 2013, along with the entire Council, they had both voted to stop the LA flipper from turning the Country Club neighborhood into a personal ATM machine by carpeting it with high-density, zero lot line tract homes. The people were ecstatic that the process of qualifying the Citizens Property Rights Initiative using a self financed, all volunteer effort, had been formally adopted and unanimously made law. But something happened on the way to the 2014 election. Facing a deep-pocket assault along the campaign trail, both politicians chose to go AWOL. Democrat Diaz claimed her ability to 'connect with the community' would make Escondido a "better place to live." But in the end, her coziness with the Beverly Hills Bully overruled her empathy for the community. Olga's campaign took his money and switched sides, endorsing his plans to amend the Escondido General Plan, which would effectively render the citizens referendum moot. She tossed the mostly older, white, Republican Country Club community vote under the bus. A cynical, but very calculated political decision. Unbeknownst to the voters, Sam had previously met secretly and encouraged the flipper, so he chose the only expedient way to avoid a conflict of interest. He decided the least costly political move would be to sit on the proverbial fence. "Let the voters decide." The voters decided, crushing the Beverly Bully's Prop H, by a huge 2 to 1 margin. So Sam won reelection, then pandered to the community, telling them he would protect their interests. He stated that the Bully was the problem, not the solution. That the community had vested property rights, and that he would demand that the property owner collaborate and come to the table to modify his homes-only plans to include other vital amenities too. He asked us to trust him... Boy, were we naive. Last week, he, Olga and councilman Mike Marasco along with Jeff Epp, the inept and outgunned City attorney who couldn't defend the historical decisions of the Escondido Planning Department and the Citizens Initiative that legally memorialized those zoning resolutions, capitulated to the LA property flipper. They simply kicked the community effort to the curb for political expediency. So much for Sam's "ethics and integrity." What a sick joke! Democrat or Republican, I am sorry to say Escondido is a microcosm of Politics in America....really ugly.
7 Comments
Christian
10/14/2015 02:35:02 pm
The reality is that money talks, ECCHO should form a PAC and start raising money to support Councilman Masson for a run for Mayor and also support Encinitas Mayor Kristin Gaspar, for Supervisor against Abed, because the last thing we need is another Pro-Developer Supervisor, all of the back country will be for sale, just think more Lilac Hills.
Reply
Rick Vasquez
10/14/2015 08:41:19 pm
Rick,
Reply
Brian Willey
10/17/2015 02:22:02 pm
When you start telling the truth, perhaps you will be taken seriously. Diaz did not "cozy up" to the investor, nor did she take his money. She supported a plan to get Escondido out of a potentially costly pickle. This was as a result of the council's illegal action, adopting the ECCHO initiative, which in and of itself was based on false information. Prop H was not perfect, but it certainly gave more to the community than we will get out of the deal now. That you and your supporters are just now realizing that Sam is a dishonest pandereris laughable. Many of us have been saying this from the start.
Reply
George Lemel
10/19/2015 05:15:36 pm
Thank you Brian for trying to spell it out for the children who wanted their toy, but not the responsibility of taking care of it! I was a member, but memberships were falling year in and year out. ECC had no membership fee to join (which I did pay years ago) and the monthly plans were not that expensive. They even offered social memberships, but not enough people wanted to join until their visual toy was taken away! Shame of those who wanted the government to take care of them!!
Reply
Liz Cook
10/20/2015 10:28:31 am
Prop H included a provision that would have completely over ruled California's Environmental Quality Act, setting a precedent that would facilitate similar actions by predatory developers everywhere and potentially harm citizens of Escondido. This was reason enough to defeat Prop H. Diaz, with long claims about supporting citizens and the environment, was apparently willing to undermine the bedrock laws that safeguard them by handing over all decisions to a fly by night investor who showed utter contempt for CC citizens, who lied to all citizens of Escondido and who couldn't wait to sue the entire city. That's leadership?
Reply
Brian Willey
10/20/2015 10:34:39 am
And this was guaranteed by the ECCHO scripted ordinance that required a vote of the people to overturn 2013-10. A vote of the people eliminates the requirement for the CEQA. This was not Schlesinger's choice nor was it Diaz's choice. It was however heavily touted as an avoidance of environmental review. In fact, had H passed, it still would have been subject to a FULL environmental review (as confirmed by The City of Escondido 11/14), just not the state CEQA. This is all information ECCHO and their supporters "forgot" to disclose to the public.
Brian Willey
10/20/2015 10:38:28 am
"... who couldn't wait to sue the entire city." Leave a Reply. |
What Happened to Our Community?The story of how a quiet corner of paradise has devolved into To review the timelines of this ongoing saga, just <click> on any Month below....
Archives
September 2019
You might also like:What happened on November 9th, 2016? Can anyone tell us how Donald Trump became leader of the free world?
Will Progressives ever own up to how they have divided the country? They whine and complain, but the truth is their policies always result in unintended consequences. I explore how Trump's Reckoning with the Cult of Progressivism is the only medicine that can restore the American Spirit of Exceptionalism, and how the world needs Americanism to thrive. Click here to buy it now! |